notes.husk.org/likes images.

759103636485849088

Image 1 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 2 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 3 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 4 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 5 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 6 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 7 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 8 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait
Image 9 of 9
berenice-abbott-paris-portrait

Berenice Abbott at 18 rue Servandoni

The portrait on the cover of Julia Van Haaften’s 2018 biography “Berenice Abbott: A Life in Photography” and at the top of Abbott’s wiki page is by an unknown photographer. It was taken for the small newspaper Paris-Midi, published June 14, 1928. Keystone France agency, and now Getty owns the rights and incorrectly dates it as 1927, while Wikipedia dates it as “1930s.”

At the time, her studio was at 18 rue Servandoni in Paris, we see the fireplace and door in the background in other portraits, such as the portrait of James Joyce’s daughter, Lucia. There’s a classic Atget at 15 rue Servandoni, but it’s from 1903-4. Atget died in 1927 and Abbott, along with Julien Levy, saved his archive. By 1930 she was in New York City, where Walker Evans made his great portrait of her.

Van Haaften writes that in search of lower rent, Abbott moved to the rue Servandoni studio in early 1928. Abbott kept a clipping of the newspaper, but there’s no further detail about the portrait session in the biography.

I was curious about the photographer of the portrait and found Getty has a handful of other frames from the same session that I’d never seen.

Most interesting of those frames is this contemplative shot showing the windows of her studio, maybe some photo chemicals on the table. A puff of smoke emanates from Abbott’s cigarette in the same place where someone has left their fingerprint on the negative or print. There’s a strong reflection or light leak in the top left corner of the frame. Van Haaften describes the rue Servandoni studio offering “beautiful north light.”

Looking at the building on Google Earth, there is one north-facing spot that has the large windows similar to the 1928 portrait, seen in the center of the screen grab below.


Another detail Van Haaften mentions is that it took Abbott months to install electricity. An electric spotlight is on a tripod behind Abbott in the standing portrait. In the alternate angle you can see a not-to-code wire dangling.

a black and white portrait of Berenice Abbott standing with a view camera on a tripod, taken in 1928, negative has some damageALT

So, who made these portraits? The Keystone France agency was an off-shoot of a popular stereoview company based in Meadville, Pennsylvania, hence “keystone.” If you’ve ever flipped through old stereoviews at a vintage shop, you recognize this brand. The French agency was founded by Alexandre Garai in 1927 (whose brother Bertram started a related Keystone in London in 1914). The Met has one photograph by Alexandre Garai, taken in 1927. The jpeg is tiny, but indicates a modern perspective. While it’s possible Garai is the photographer, his brother’s ethos seems to have been to be the boss … and never touch a camera.

The identity could be buried deep in Getty’s London warehouse, which stores 80 million photographs and negatives. When these frames were scanned and metadata added to Getty in 2010-2016, if there was a name on the back of the prints, it probably would have been added then.

From the photos themselves, it’s difficult to say if Abbott had a rapport or was familiar with the photographer: her default intensity is remarkably consistent her entire life, up until the last portrait of her in 1991.

black and white portrait of Berenice Abbott, 1929ALT
color portrait of Berenice Abbott in japanese robe, 1991ALT

(left, rue Servandoni 1929, right: Hank O'Neal, Berenice Abbott, Last Portrait, Monson, Maine July 17, 1991)

From the resolution, the depth of field on the lens, these are probably shot with a 4x5 or larger camera. It looks like the photographer shot the lens wide open, the camera in the standing portraits looks very much in focus, while Abbott’s face looks slightly out of focus.

Two of the four frames have similar damage, could be a development problem, but could be mold later while in storage. Abbott’s Paris portraits of the period were shot on glass (as much of Atget’s body of work was), though by the late 1920s glass plates had mostly been replaced by film. Annoyingly, Getty is one of the best places online to see her Paris portraits, but the Steidl book is highly recommended. Seen together, you realize why Man Ray felt threatened, or at least annoyed, by his former assistant.

grid of Paris portraits by Berenice Abbott
ALT

The photographer was either challenged or in a challenging environment. Abbott was often a withering critic, one can imagine a green photographer shows up to make portraits and encounters a prickly subject. With the seated portrait above, at first glance, I thought maybe the print has a piece torn out of the left side? Or is it a modern lamp intruding on the composition?

It’s difficult to tell with the window portrait how much of it is a metering mistake or the potential development issue, but it looks several stops overexposed to be of use in publication of that time. Today, with our phone cameras taking three frames and digitally merging exposure, we can romanticize the top half of her body dissolving into the light is as the “magic of film.”

I’m calling this the “last” frame of the session, based only on the fact that her pose and facial expression has shifted from intensity to a mix of boredom and exasperation. The photographer told her to sit on the day bed with tea and a book, “look relaxed,” but she wants nothing to do with it.

Date posted: 2024/08/17 23:08:01
Date liked: 2024/08/18 03:08:49
32 Tumblr notes
Liked from: it's never summer
Post tagged:

No tags