notes.husk.org/likes images.

806357656146182144

Image 1 of 4
the-undaily-pic-is-glass-tears-a-1933-image
Image 2 of 4
the-undaily-pic-is-glass-tears-a-1933-image
Image 3 of 4
the-undaily-pic-is-glass-tears-a-1933-image
Image 4 of 4
the-undaily-pic-is-glass-tears-a-1933-image

THE (UN)DAILY PIC is “Glass Tears,” a 1933 image from the fabulous Man Ray show at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The wall text said that the photo was conceived (and used) for an ad for smudge-proof mascara.

Other texts explained that the second image at the top of this post, from the pages of the spring 1922 issue of the culture magazine Feuilles Libres, was the first publication of one of Man Ray’s great photograms, with more published that fall on a page in Vanity Fair (my third image).

I’ve been working through ideas about the way that modern artists (and especially Marcel Duchamp) realized that, since the Renaissance, Western fine art has always been about picking out certain objects to use as art, rather than creating objects that were inherently art-full. (Because nothing stands as art, without being used as that.)

Man Ray’s integration of fine and commercial art is grist for my mill, but I’m more interested, right now, in how fine art got adopted into the world of the commercial. I wonder if art directors intuited the modernist blurring of borders that I’ve been thinking about: If, at any given moment, an object might or might not be working as fine art, that meant that it might always be available for commercial purposes.

Date posted: 2026/01/21 13:01:26
Date liked: 2026/01/21 16:01:10
7 Tumblr notes
Liked from: BLAKE GOPNIK on art
Post tagged:

No tags

Automatically generated tags:
surrealism 183
modern art 156
vintage advertisement 82
vintage magazine 34
abstract photography 21
man ray 10
vanity fair 4
1920s art 1
photogram 1
rayographs 1